Empreendedorismo sustentável: uma análise bibliométrica
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF
FLIP
HTML
XML
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Objetivo. Analisar a informação contida no Scopus no domínio do empreendedorismo sustentável e identificar a estrutura do conhecimento em termos de temas relevantes e suas tendências, autores e países líderes e sua cooperação.
Metodologia. Para tanto, foi aplicada uma análise bibliométrica que permitiu descrever e estruturar os avanços, o volume de produção e os atores mais relevantes no campo em estudo; um campo em fase de crescimento com interesse científico em acelerar a transição para a sustentabilidade, onde predominam as pesquisas em negócios, administração e contabilidade. Resultados. O empreendedorismo sustentável responde aos desafios causados pelos atuais padrões de produção e consumo, incorporando componentes ambientais, sociais e económicos nas ações empresariais; o seu estudo centrou-se principalmente na sustentabilidade dos modelos de negócio e na análise de ecossistemas empresariais. Conclusões. As tendências de investigação, os avanços e a estrutura dos envolvidos permitem-nos concluir que o empreendedorismo sustentável é um modelo de mudanças no setor empresarial e científico em que se avalia o impacto no ambiente e nas comunidades para modificar
as condições existentes através da inovação, comercial e tecnológica, melhorias.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Ahmad, N.H. et al. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship practices in Malaysian manufacturing SMEs: The role of individual, organisational and institutional factors. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 16(2), 153-171.
https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2020.105986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2020.105986
Ahmed, A. and McQuaid, R.W. (2005). Entrepreneurship, management, and sustainable development. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 6-30.
https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2005.007750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2005.007750
Alean Pico, A. et al. (2017). ¿El emprendimiento como estrategia para el desarrollo humano y social? Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, 12(1), 107-123.
https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2017v12n1.1470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2017v12n1.1470
Anand, A. et al. (2021). Trends and patterns in sustainable entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric review and research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(3), 106092.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106092
Angulo, G.L. et al. (2018). Ambiente y sostenibilidad: una mirada desde la producción científica. Santa Marta, Colombia: Universidad del Magdalena.
Arru, B. (2020). An integrative model for understanding the sustainable entrepreneurs' behavioural intentions: an empirical study of the Italian context. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(4), 3519-3576.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00356-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00356-x
Bischoff, K. and Volkmann, C.K. (2018). Stakeholder support for sustainable entrepreneurship-a framework of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 172-201.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092714
Cantos-Mateos, G. et al. (2013). Estudio comparativo sobre la visualización de redes de co-words a través de los descriptores del Science Citation Index y de Medline. En II Congreso ISKO España y Portugal / XII Congreso ISKO España, Oporto, Portugal.
Carayannis, E.G., Evans, D. and Hanson, M. (2003). A cross-cultural learning strategy for entrepreneurship education: Outline of key concepts and lessons learned from a comparative study of entrepreneurship students in France and the US. Technovation, 23(9), 757-771.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00030-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00030-5
Ceptureanu, G.E. et al. (2018). Factors Influencing Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Romanian Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Basiq International Conference: New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption, 40-48.
Cohen, B. and Winn, M.I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29-49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001
Colorado, Y.S. y Pérez-Anaya, O. (2018). La evaluación de la actividad científica: indicadores bibliométricos. En Ávila, J.H. (Coord.), Cienciometría y bibliometría.
El estudio de la producción científica. Métodos, enfoques y aplicaciones en el estudio de las Ciencias Sociales (pp. 95-117). Barranquilla, Colombia: Corporación Universitaria Reformada.
Crals, E. and Vereeck, L. (2005). The affordability of sustainable entrepreneurship certification for SMEs. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12(2), 173-183.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500509469628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500509469628
Daly, H. and Farley, J. (2011). Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. Washington, USA: Island Press.
Dean, T.J. and McMullen, J.S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003
Gadhia, D. (2011). Indian solar thermal technology- Technology to protect environment and ecology. En Hesselbach, J. and Herrmann, C. (Eds.), Glocalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufacturing (pp. 40-43). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19692-8_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19692-8_7
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J.M. and Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 194-220.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
Gutiérrez, J.K.R. y Velasco, N.Y.G. (2017). Redes de coautoría como herramienta de evaluación de la producción científica de los grupos de investigación. Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion, 27(2), 279-297.
https://doi.org/10.5209/RGID.58204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/RGID.58204
Hansen, E.G. and Schaltegger, S. (2013). 100 per cent organic? A sustainable entrepreneurship perspective on the diffusion of organic clothing. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 583-598.
https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2013-0074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2013-0074
Keijzers, G. (2002). The transition to the sustainable enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(4), 349-359.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00051-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00051-8
Klewitz, J. and Hansen, E.G. (2014). Sustainabilityoriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57-75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017
Knight, S. (2003). Integrating stormwater management with economic, social, cultural and ecological goals in Christchurch, New Zealand. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 10(3), 181-191.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2003.10648589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2003.10648589
Koe, W.-L., Omar, R. and Sa'ari, J.R. (2015). Factors Influencing Propensity to Sustainable Entrepreneurship of SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 570-577.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.404
Kraus, S. et al. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship orientation: A reflection on status-quo research on factors facilitating responsible managerial practices. Sustainability, 10(2), 444.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020444
Liao, H. et al. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability, 10(1), 166.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166
Marenco, A.D. (2018). Análisis de redes sociales e indicadores de producción y cooperación científica. En Ávila, J.H. (Coord.), Cienciometría y bibliometría. El estudio de la producción científica. Métodos, enfoques y aplicaciones en el estudio de las Ciencias Sociales (pp. 119-146). Barranquilla, Colombia: Corporación Universitaria Reformada.
Moya-Clemente, I., Ribes-Giner, G. and Chaves-Vargas, J. C. (2021). Sustainable entrepreneurship: An approach from bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(2), 297- 319.
https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.13934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.13934
Muñoz, P. and Cohen, B. (2017). Towards a socialecological understanding of sustainable venturing. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.12.001
Neumeyer, X. and Santos, S.C. (2018). Sustainable business models, venture typologies, and entrepreneurial ecosystems: A social network perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4565-4579.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.216
Pacheco, D.F., Dean, T.J. and Payne, D.S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464-480.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006
Parrish, B.D. and Foxon, T.J. (2006). Sustainability entrepreneurship and equitable transitions to a low-carbon economy. Greener Management International, 55, 47-62.
https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2006.au.00006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2006.au.00006
Pinkse, J. and Groot, K. (2015). Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Political Activity: Overcoming Market Barriers in the Clean Energy Sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 633-654.
https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12055
Riggio-Olivares, G. (2017). Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica de la República Dominicana (tesis de posgrado). Doctorado en Documentación, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe, España.
Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (2008). Types of sustainable entrepreneurship and conditions for sustainability innovation: From the administration of a technical challenge to the management of an entrepreneurial opportunity. En Wüstenhagen, R. (Ed.), Sustainable Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 27-48). Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848441552.00009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848441552.00009
Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222-237.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682
Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E.G. and Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business Models for Sustainability: Origins, Present Research, and Future Avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3-10.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615599806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615599806
Schaltegger, S., Beckmann, M. and Hockerts, K. (2018). Collaborative entrepreneurship for sustainability. Creating solutions in light of the UN sustainable development goals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 131-152.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092709
Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
Simatupang, T.M., Schwab, A. and Lantu, D.C. (2015). Building Sustainable Entrepreneurship Ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 26(4), 389-398.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161598
Soto-Acosta, P. et al. (2016). Sustainable entrepreneurship in SMEs: A business performance perspective. Sustainability, 8(4), 342.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040342
Suárez, Y. y Pérez, O. (2018). La evaluación de la actividad científica: indicadores bibliométricos. En Ávila, J.H. (Coord.), Cienciometría y bibliometría. El estudio de la producción científica. Métodos, enfoques y aplicaciones en el estudio de las Ciencias Sociales (pp. 96-118). Barranquilla, Colombia: Corporación Universitaria Reformada.
Terán-Yépez, E. et al. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Review of its evolution and new trends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119742.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119742
Terán, E. y Guerrero, A. (2020). Teorías de emprendimiento: revisión crítica de la literatura y sugerencias para futuras investigaciones. Revista Espacios, 41, 7.
Tilley, F. and Parrish, B.D. (2006). From poles to wholes: facilitating an integrated approach to sustainable entrepreneurship. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 2(4), 281-294.
https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2006.010214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2006.010214
Tomás-Górriz, V. y Tomás-Casterá, V. (2018). La bibliometría en la evaluación de la actividad científica. Hospital a Domicilio, 2(4), 145-163.
https://doi.org/10.22585/hospdomic.v2i4.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22585/hospdomic.v2i4.51
Tur-Porcar, A., Roig-Tierno, N. and Mestre, A.L. (2018). Factors affecting entrepreneurship and business sustainability. Sustainability, 10(2), 452.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020452
Van Aardt, I. et al. (2008). Entrepreneurship and new venture management. Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.
van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. En Ding, Y., Rousseau, R. and Wolfram, D. (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods (pp. 285-320). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer Manual version 1.6.16. Leiden, Nederland: Univeristeit Leiden.
Young, W. and Tilley, F. (2006). Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 402- 415
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.510
