Inovação no modelo de negócios nas empresas instaladas em um ambiente de inovação: uma análise no Feevale Techpark

Inovação no modelo de negócios nas empresas instaladas em um ambiente de inovação: uma análise no Feevale Techpark

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Abstract

The search for the development of innovative businesses has led many universities to establish technological parks for the development of start-ups.
The Feevale Techpark represents one of those environments in which innovative entrepreneurships in their business models are established in the search for support and synergy for their growth. Understanding innovation in the business model of the companies set up in the park was the aim of this research. To measure innovation in the business model the dimensions of the Canvas model were used. The methodological approach included the development of a survey to gather information with the application of an online questionnaire. The study considered a population of 34 companies, of which 25 responded the questionnaire. From the data analysis it was verified that the highest innovation level is found in the value proposition dimension, followed by: Customer segment, cost structure, customer relationships, channels, key resources, main agreements and, lastly, revenue streams. It was perceived that scientific knowledge is a fundamental factor in these entrepreneurships that associated to the capacity to identify differentiation opportunities with a focus
on customer needs, has led to the development of innovative businesses. The association between knowledge and market opportunities is one of the ways to generate innovative businesses allowing the development of start-ups aimed at addressing existing needs, buy in ways more adequate to market demand.

Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Author Biographies / See

Moema Pereira Nunes

Doctora en Administración. Profesora Adjunta. Universidade Feevale, Novo Hamburgo, Brasil.

Thamires Stoffel

Tecnóloga en Comercio Exterior. Universidade Feevale, Novo Hamburgo, Brasil.

Daniela De Mello

Estudiante de Administración de Empresas. Universidade Feevale, Novo Hamburgo, Brasil.

References

Amit, R. and Zoot, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 493-520.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.187

Audretsch, D.B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39 (3), 313-321.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1

Audy, J.L.N. (2006). Entre a Tradição e a Renovação: Os desafios da Universidade Empreendedora. En Morosini, M. (Org.), A Universidade no Brasil: concepções e modelos. Brasilia, Brasil: Instituto de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira.

Barcellos, E.E.I., Botura Júnior, G.B. and Ramirez, C.M.S. (2016). The creative economy on the environment of the technological parks and incubators. International Journal of Innovation, 4 (2), 140-154.

Bittencourt, B. et al. (2019). Cluster Innovation Capability: A systematic review. International Journal of Innovation, 7 (1), 26-44.

https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v7i1.157

Bonazzi, F.L.Z. e Zilber, M.A. (2014). Inovação e Modelo de Negócio: um estudo de caso sobre a integração

do Funil de Inovação e o Modelo Canvas. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 16 (55), 616-637.

Calixto, C.V. e Fleury, M.T.L. (2015). Business model: desvendando o constructo. Internext. Regista Eletrônica de Negócios Internacionais, 10 (2), 18-30.

https://doi.org/10.18568/1980-4865.10218-30

Casadesus-Masanell, R. and Ricart, J.E. (2010). Competitiveness: Business model reconfiguration for innovation and internationalization. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy Management, 8 (2), 123-149.

https://doi.org/10.1108/1536-541011066470

Cassiolato, J.E. e Lastres, H.M.M. (2003). O foco em arranjos produtivos e inovativos locais de micro e pequenas empresas. En Lastres, H.M.M., Cassiolato, J.E. e Maciel, M.L. Pequena empresa: cooperação e desenvolvimento local. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Relume-Dumará.

Carayannis, E. and Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The Quadruple/ Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 5 (2), 212-239.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8

Cavalcante, S.A., Kesting, P. and Ulhoi, J.P. (2011). Business Model Dynamics and Innovation: (Re) establishing the Missing Linkages. Management Decision, 49 (8), 1327-1342.

https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111163142

Cendón, B.V., Ribeiro, N.A. e Chaves, C.J. (2014). Pesquisas de survey: análise das reações dos respondentes. informação e Sociedade, 24 (3), 29-48.

Etzkowitz, H. (2009). Hélice tríplice: universidade-indústria- governo: inovação em ação. Porto Alegre, Brasil: EDIPUCRS.

Gaino, A.A.P. e Pamplona, J.B. (2013). Abordagem teórica dos condicionantes da formação e consolidação dos parques tecnológicos. Production, 24 (1), 177-187.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132013005000027

Gil, A.C. (2017). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Atlas.

Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J.A. and Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities'activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44 (3), 748-764.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.008

Guimarães, S.K. (2011). Empreendedorismo intensivo em conhecimento no Brasil. Caderno CRH, 24 (63), 575-591.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-49792011000300008

Hamel, G. (2000). The End of Progress. Business Strategy Review, 11 (3), 69-78.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8616.00150

Hwang, J. and Christensen, C.M. (2008). Disruptive Innovation in Health Care Delivery: A Framework for Business-Model Innovation. Health Affairs, 27 (5), 1329-1335.

https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1329

Lai, Y. et al. (2014). The effects of industry cluster knowledge management on innovation performance.Journal of Business Research, 67 (5), 734- 739.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.036

Landt, M. and Damstrup, M.V. (2013). Innovation Adoption's Effect on Established Business Models as Means to Adjust in a Rapid Changing Technological and Innovative Lanscape: A case study on Business Models, innovation Hype Cycles, and the street process for adopting innovation. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School.

Lindgart, Z. et al. (2009). Business Model Innovation: When the Game Gets Tough, Change the Game. Boston,USA: The Boston Consulting Group.

Machado, H.V., Lazzarotti, F. and Bencke, F.F. (2018). Innovation models and technological parks: Interaction between parks and innovation agents. Journal of Technology and Innovation Management, 13 (2), 104-114.

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242018000200104

Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 19-25.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00177.x

Nascimento, P.S.O. et al. (2016). A dinâmica do conhecimento na construção de uma universidade empreendedora: potencialidades e fragilidades observadas na Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Revista GUAL, 9 (4), 146-166.

https://doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2016v9n4p146

Nielsen, C. and Lund, M. (Ed.). (2012). Business model: Networking, innovating and globalizing. Recuperado de http://ebooksforexcellence.files.wordpress. com/2012/12/business-models.pdf.

Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2011). Business Model Generation. Inovaçã o em Modelos de Negócios: um manual para visionários, inovadores e revolucionários. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Alta Books.

Plé, L., Lecocq, X. and Angot, J. (2010). Customer-integrated business models: A theoretical framework. M@n@gement, 4 (13), 226-265.

https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.134.0226

Pohle, G. and Chapman, M. (2006). IBM's Global CEO Report 2006: Business model innovation matters. Strategy and Leadership, 34 (5), 34-40.

https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570610701531

Prodanov, C.C. e Freitas, E.C. (2013). Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. Novo Hamburgo, Brasil: Universidade Feevale.

Sanz, L. (2001). Science/Technology Park. International Association of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation - IASP. Recuperado de http://www.iasp.ws/knowledge-bites.

Schneider, S. and Spieth, P. (2013). Business Model Innovation: Towards an integrated future research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Management, 37 (1), 1-34.

https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961340001X

Steiner, J.E., Cassim, M.B. and Robazzi, A.C. (2013). Parques tecnológicos: ambientes de inovação. São Paulo, Brasil: Instituo de Estudos Avançados da Universidade de São Paulo.

Stewart, D.W. and Zhao, Q. (2000). Internet marketing, business models and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19 (2), 287-296.

https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.2.287.17125

Teece, D.J. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43 (2), 172- 194.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003

Timmers, P. (1998). Business Models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8 (2), 3-8.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10196789800000016

Veloso Filho, F.A. e Nogueira, J.M. (2006). Sistemas de inovação e promoção tecnológica regional e local no Brasil. Interações, 8 (13), 107-117.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1518-70122006000200012

Vergara, S.C. (2000). Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa em administração. São Paulo, Brasil: Editora Atlas.

Xie, K. et al. (2018). Technological entrepreneurship in science parks: A case study of Wuhan Dong High-Tech Zone. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 135 (C), 156-168.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.021

Zott, C. and Amit, R. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (6-7), 493-520.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.187

Zott, C. and Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (1), 1-26.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.642

Zott, C. and Amit, R. (2010). Business Model Design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43 (2), 216-226.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004

Cited by