Purchases for corporate needs in Russia’s regions in 2019
Objective. To consider the indicators that characterize purchases for the needs of large corporations with state participation in the regions of Russia. Methodology. The study uses relevant information for 82 regions of Russia. The methodology of the research base on evaluation functions density of normal distribution volumes of contracts on regions. Results. The results of research are calculation of four indicators’ values that demonstrate the regional aspects of procurement for corporate needs, including the contracts signed by small businesses or with their participation. Conclusions. It was proved that average
share of the contracts with small enterprises is about 20 %; the value of every indicator is significantly varied in different regions of Russia. The article confirms the lack of connection between the values of each indicator and such factors as the level of economic development of regions and their geographical location.
Agapova, E.V. and Belyaeva, O.A. (2019). Limits of transparency of corporate procurement. Economic Sciences, 175, 18-23.
Albano, G.L. et al. (2015). Evaluating Small Businesses Performance in Public E-Procurement: Evidence from the Italian Government's E-Marketplace. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12190
Altayyar, A. and Beaumont-Kerridge, J. (2016). An Investigation into barriers to the adoption of e-procurement within selected SMEs in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Business and Economics, 7(3), 451-466.
Andrianova, N.V. (2019). Information platforms in the system of state and corporate procurement. Innovation and Investment, 9, 267-271.
Barkatunov, V.F. and Larina, O.G. (2019). Elements of digital technologies, legal innovations and efficiency of financial resources management in the procurement process for state and municipal needs. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law, 9(3), 53-73.
Fernandes, T. and Vieira, V. (2015). Public e-procurement impacts in small- and medium-enterprises. International Journal of Procurement Management, 8(5), 587-607. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2015.070904
Flynn, A. (2018). Investigating the Implementation of SME-Friendly Policy in Public Procurement. Policy Studies, 39(4), 422-443.
Kiseleva, O. et al. (2019). Specialization and concentration of small and medium enterprises employees: Russian data. Amazonia Investiga, 8(20), 6-15.
Kostyuchenko, A.G. (2015). State and corporate procurement as a tool for support and development of small business entities. Business, Management and Law, 31, 128-131.
Lewis-Faupel, S. et al. (2016). Can Electronic Procurement Improve Infrastructure Provision? Evidence from Public Works in India and Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 258-283. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140258
Pinkovetskaia, I. et al. (2019). Female entrepreneurship development in the Russian Federation. Amazonia Investiga, 8(18), 111-118.
Pinkovetskaia, I. et al. (2020). Small and medium enterprises in Russia and other countries. Amazonia Investiga, 9(25), 99-106.
Stake, J. (2017). Evaluating Quality or Lowest Price: Consequences for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Public Procurement. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1143-1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9477-4
Vaidya, K. and Campbell, J. (2016). Multidisciplinary evaluating its impact on procurement efficiency. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(2), 333-348.
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista Perspectiva Empresarial
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Esta revista usa el servicio Cited-By y Reference Linking de Crossref, lo que permite mostrar aquí las citas registradas en Crossref para cada documento que tenga un DOI activo.
Este documento aún no registra citas en Crossref.