ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES
E-ISSN 2389-8194
Vol. 12, No. 1
Enero-junio de 2025
doi: https://doi.org/10.16967/23898186.925
pp. 6-22
rpe.ceipa.edu.co
* Doctor in Management Science & Engineering. Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. E-mail: 2022521081077@stu.edu.cn. ORCID: 0009-
0003-0449-2655. Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=zkkK8UcAAAAJ&hl=en. Scopus Author ID: https://www.
scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=59194743800.
Does Going Green Pay O? Empirical
Analysis of Green Innovation and Financial
Performance in Pakistan
Shah Mehmood Wagan*
E-ISSN 2389-8194
Vol. 12, No. 1
Enero-junio de 2025
doi: https://doi.org/10.16967/23898186.925
COMO CITAR ESTE ARTÍCULO
How to cite this article:
Mehmood, S. (2025). Does Going
Green Pay O? Empirical Analysis
of Green Innovation and Financial
Performance in Pakistan. Revista
Perspectiva Empresarial, 12(1),
6-22.
Recibido: 15 de abril de 2025
Aceptado: 20 de junio de 2025
ABSTRACT Green innovation supports businesses decrease their environmental influence
while they expand eciency, competitiveness, and protability. Objective. Examine impact
of green innovation on the nancial performance of rms in Pakistan, using panel data from
2015 to 2024. Methodology. The study adopts a quantitative approach, using xed-eects
regression models to observe the relationship between green innovation and nancial
performance, while also testing the mediating role of regulatory compliance and moderating
eect of rm size. Results. With rising global focus on sustainability, understanding how
environmentally friendly practices influence economic results is crucial—mainly in developing
economies like the Pakistan, where industrial growth oen conflicts with environmental
concerns. The results show a statistically signicant positive relationship between green
innovation and nancial performance, as evaluated by Return on Assets, Return on Equity,
and Tobin’s Q. Conclusion. Regulatory compliance is found to improve this relationship,
suggesting that institutional pressures reinforce the nancial benets of sustainable
practices.
KEY WORDS Green Innovation, Financial Performance, Panel Regression, Sustainability,
Corporate Governance, Pakistan.
¿Vale la pena apostar por la sostenibilidad? Un análisis empírico de la
innovación verde y el desempeño nanciero en Pakistán
RESUMEN La innovación verde permite a las organizaciones reducir su huella ambiental
y mejorar su eciencia, competitividad y rentabilidad. Objetivo. Analizar el impacto de la
innovación verde en el desempeño nanciero de las empresas pakistaníes, utilizando datos
de panel del período 2015-2024. Metodología. El estudio adopta un enfoque cuantitativo,
empleando modelos de regresión de efectos jos para investigar la relación entre la
innovación verde y el desempeño nanciero, así como para evaluar el papel mediador del
cumplimiento normativo y el efecto moderador del tamaño de la empresa. Resultados. Con
el creciente enfoque global en la sostenibilidad es crucial comprender cómo las prácticas
amigables con el medio ambiente inciden en los resultados económicos, particularmente
en economías en desarrollo como Pakistán en donde el crecimiento industrial a menudo
entra en conflicto con las preocupaciones medioambientales. Los resultados muestran una
relación positiva y estadísticamente signicativa entre la innovación verde y el desempeño
nanciero medido por el rendimiento de los activos, el rendimiento del capital y la Q de
Tobin. Conclusiones. Esta relación se fortalece mediante el cumplimiento normativo, lo
que sugiere que las presiones institucionales incrementan los benecios nancieros de
las prácticas sostenibles.
PALABRAS CLAVE innovación verde, desempeño financiero, regresión de panel,
sostenibilidad, gobierno corporativo, Pakistán.
8
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194
Vale a pena investir em sustentabilidade? Uma análise empírica da
inovação verde e do desempenho nanceiro no Paquistão
RESUMO A inovação verde permite que as organizações reduzam seu impacto
ambiental e melhorem sua eciência, competitividade e lucratividade. Objetivo.
Analisar o impacto da inovação verde no desempenho nanceiro de empresas
paquistanesas, utilizando dados em painel de 2015 a 2024. Metodologia. O estudo
adota uma abordagem quantitativa, empregando modelos de regressão de efeitos xos
para investigar a relação entre inovação verde e desempenho nanceiro, bem como
para avaliar o papel mediador da conformidade regulatória e o efeito moderador do
tamanho da empresa. Resultados. Com o crescente foco global na sustentabilidade,
é crucial entender como as práticas ambientalmente corretas impactam os resultados
econômicos, particularmente em economias em desenvolvimento como o Paquistão,
onde o crescimento industrial muitas vezes entra em conflito com as preocupações
ambientais. Os resultados mostram uma relação positiva e estatisticamente
signicativa entre inovação verde e desempenho nanceiro, medido pelo retorno
sobre ativos, retorno sobre patrimônio líquido e Q de Tobin. Conclusões. Essa relação
é fortalecida pela conformidade regulatória, sugerindo que as pressões institucionais
aumentam os benefícios nanceiros das práticas sustentáveis.
PALAVRAS CHAVE inovação verde, desempenho nanceiro, regressão de painel,
sustentabilidade, governança corporativa, Paquistão.
9
ARTÍCULOS
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194
Introduction
The challenge to sustainably manage our
environment has rapidly risen to become a vital
international issue since the past few decades.
Developments in environmental sustainability have
prompted governmental bodies and international
organizations together with businesses to push
for sustainable development initiatives. Green
innovation implementation is one of the primary
business strategies that enables corporations to
reduce their environmental footprint in addition
to enhancing performance excellence and business
standings. The design and implementation of
product or process as well as systems management
that minimizes the level of wastes and increasing

technologies are the quality that characterize
green innovation. Weak regulations and the access
to eco-friendly technologies and the absence of
environmental awareness of business leaders
trigger the economic development resulting in
the destruction of the environment in the given

2025). Urgent demands from international supply
chains as well as domestic and foreign investors
have created forces that are compelling Pakistani
industries to implement sustainable operational


priority because it ensures business sustainability
together with environmentally conscious national

The relationship between environmental
innovations and financial gains has not received
enough empirical examination specifically within
the Pakistani context although sustainability
grows in popularity. Current research mainly
examines environmental policies at the macro-

without establishing financial effects for
individual firms. The absence of research
obstructs policymakers and business leaders and
market investors from making proper investment
decisions for green technologies. Not all firms can
easily access the potential advantages of green
innovation such as cost reductions and market
distinction and danger prevention and other
financial advantages. Studies should undertake an
adequate analysis of the effect of green innovation
on profitability and profit-on-investment and
market valuation in Pakistani companies.

in question examines the validity of the hypothesis




compared to Tobin; (ii) this study determines the

size and industry type and ownership structure on
the relationship between environmental innovation

research offers vital strategic guidelines that aid
decision-makers when they adopt environmental
sustainability principles into business operations.

expand both theoretical and empirical knowledge
in terms of green innovation under the conditions
of developing countries.
This research is applicable to several groups in
one way or another. The outcomes of the research
provide legitimate guidance to the businesses
based in high-pollution sectors that allows them
to implement minimum decisions regarding the
adoption of green technology and sustainable
activities. The analysis outcomes enable managers
to match their corporate strategies to the global
trends on the environmental responsibilities.
      
developing accurate regulatory frameworks that
encourages sustainable innovation. By accurately
understanding sustainable practices associated
     
economic institutions attain improved resource
investments in case they are allocating capital
to changing industries. The study adds valuable
quantitative information in an emerging economy

   

Institutional Theory to research their application
in the non-Western institutional context.
The remaining portion of this research study is
sub-divided into six sections. Section 2 includes an
extensive evaluation of important research articles
in addition to theoretical bases and past empirical
10
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194
studies. Section 3 describes both the research
    
sources and analytical procedures used. Section
4 presents the empirical results which include
descriptions of statistical data alongside correlation
results and regression models with robustness
tests. The paper analyzes empirical results against
theoretical foundations and existing literature while
presenting policy and managerial implications in

presents the conclusions study outcomes while
suggesting future research paths.
Literature review

 
are interrelated because the former forms the
conceptual foundation of the current study because
the constructs demonstrate that they are vital in
understanding how sustainable business practice
is formed in the developing economic scenario in

    
innovation of new standardized products and
systems of operation and new products and
operation systems as well as breakthroughs in green
engineering which have a high level of reduction
of environmental impact and meet sustainability


which decrease the pollution rate and safeguard
the natural resources and guarantee sustainable
economic cycles.
  
health of the businesses exhibited by companies



ratios per share (EPS). Financial indicators are
measures of how the company is doing in relation

equity and also to the volume of their marketing

even though it initially needs preliminary spending
due to its opening operational potentials and
market entry and regulatory conformity as well
as improved reputation.
The authors discuss the connection between

through the application of Stakeholder Theory

Porter Hypothesis as the central theoretical models.
The main concept of Stakeholder Theory is that
any organization ought to cater to the interest of
all stakeholders besides the shareholders in order
to achieve future ultimate business success (Gidage

   
societal requirements contributes to increased
trust of its stakeholders and regulatory bodies
and shareholders which achieves an improved
competitive positioning and legitimacy.
    
position of an entity persists thanks to unique
resources which have a value as well as being hard



make organizations cut production expenses as well
as increasing productivity and differentiating their
products in the market.
Properly designed environmental regulations

lead companies to create new solutions that


as a resource obtain economic advantages through
their investments. Environmental forecasting
models alongside the KFW hypothesis and List and
Hendricks theory establish a strong basis to study

progressive corporate approaches.
Empirical literature
   
correlations between GI and financial success
based on industry distribution and geographical

show that firms participating in GI achieve
better profitability through market valuation
      
demonstrated that environmental innovation
drives upward firm valuation because it grants
better risk mitigation and enhances stakeholder

11
ARTÍCULOS
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194

or undesirable results because sustainable
technology adoption initially costs more than

particularly in short-term periods. The negative
economic aspects from sustainable practices
usually decrease as businesses achieve their

waste reduction and operational enhancement.
Various results emerge from research

study conducted demonstrated Chinese companies
experience positive effects from green patent

supports the Porter Hypothesis concept within
   

   



about GI remaining indecisive has shifted toward



its effect on corporate performance in Pakistan
exists within isolated and constrained boundaries.
Current academic research examines corporate
social responsibility practices and environmental
regulations as main subjects without deep analysis of
sustainability initiatives that stem from innovation.
The industrial sector of Pakistan which faces
high risk from climate change has demonstrated
minimal progress in implementing green
technologies together with sustainable operational
practices. Linking performance with sustainability
is slowly changing because of growing regulations
alongside international standards for trade. Since
2013 the Securities and Exchange Commission of

which started requiring ESG reports from listed
companies. Under the Pakistan Environmental

meet pollution control requirements which drives
them to adopt more environmentally friendly
production practices.

focuses on disclosure practices instead of studying
genuine environmental innovation activities.

revealed that manufacturing companies used

keeping their information transparent at minimal


research did not include the evaluation of innovation
for sustainable goal achievement.
      
literature research even as it expands despite

lacks studies which observe how GI relates to

Cross-sectional research forms most literary data
while lacking strength to prove direct cause-effect
links and showing shifts through time.
    

particularly Pakistan remains limited. The current
literature makes blanket uses of multinational

setting and market conditions among regional

approach GI by classifying organizations into two
groups based on whether they have any green
initiatives or not without explaining the level or

Methodology


a quantitative approach into this research. The
analysis utilizes panel regression models that serve
as a well-suited method to study data with both
time components and cross-section units in this

and 2024. Panel regression functions as a method

enhanced variability and degrees of freedom when
used instead of time- series or cross-sectional data
analysis only.
The research implements three main types of


12
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194


own personal intercept under the Fixed Effects



distribution along with being uncorrelated with
      

test to verify if individual effects are correlated with
the explanatory variables. The analysis employed


this model handles endogenous errors.

and performance measurements are mainly based
on yearly reports of businesses listed at Pakistan

levels as well as liquidity situations and business
sustainability and operational performance basis.

evaluate the business performance both in the
past and future possible success. Data of stock

using the advanced systems such as Bloomberg

 

showing investor response and market behavior.

the SECP forms one of the key data centers in terms
of regulatory and compliance rematerialize with
corporate governance records and legal provisions
records as well as securities standards compliance
     
the State Bank of Pakistan provide access to
macroeconomic indicators through researchers that

economic conditions in the country (nationwide)


reports are used by companies to disclose their
sustainability reports that extract GI metrics that
are critical to the present-day sustainability-driven



the information on intellectual property such as in
the form of patents trademarks copyrights and other
intellectual assets that portray the advancements
of the technologies and competitive advantages.
      


based opportunities in which data is accessible.
    

    
information must be accessible continuously for
at least eight out of ten years; (ii) annual reports
along with sustainability reports remain accessible

expenditures and environmental initiatives. Study

based on their market capitalization rankings as
initial sample group. The selection process using
data completeness and relevance tests provides a

Variables


on four universally recognized indicators which
    
      

through its measurement of asset utilization
against net income using total asset values and
  

returns and wealth maximization ability through
      
    

transactions for valuation purposes thus enabling







indicators for analysis therefore researchers
construct a composite index (GI Index) which

on eco-friendly technologies and environmental

to developing ecological solutions emerges through
green patents which represent the annual patents
   
13
ARTÍCULOS
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194
thus demonstrating its sustainable innovation

investment into environment-friendly projects
constitutes a guiding metric to determine how
organizations combine environmental innovation
with their strategic priorities toward sustainable

binary environmental data points about eco-
friendly activities which provides qualitative
evidence regarding their operational adherence
    
continuous n dimensions the entire system provides
stakeholders with holistic metrics to measure the

through quantitative and qualitative aspects of GI.
      

accurately represent their GI capabilities. This is
done because the innovation effort in environmental

operational efforts cannot be fully captured using
patents as an indicator on their own. Equation 1

expenditure and environmental initiatives) to

    
enables a comprehensive evaluation of GI intensity
by reducing the impact of scaling and integrating
quantitative and qualitative elements into a singular
measure.
GIii
GreenPatentsi
i σP

i

i, σR
i
qualitative or binary score indicating the presence
and scope of additional environmental initiatives
     
α1α2
α3
or derived through principal component analysis to

to the overall index.
Standardization procedures make it possible
to compare variables with differing measurement
scales while minimizing the impact of anomalous
     
      
researchers use as their main independent variable
in statistical models.
Control variables

asset data transformed into natural logarithmic

between organizations thus adjusting for potential

leverage through the total debt per total equity

capital structure because this metric affects both
strategic decisions and corporate performance. The

its operational experience and maturity through
its years since incorporation which affects both
its operational performance and market position
strategy. Industry characteristics are checked




macroeconomic environment through its annual
percentage changes to eliminate external economic

supplementary variables strengthen research
validity because they isolate important main
variables from interfering external components.
Model specication
Study estimate the following panel regression


14
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194
FPiti
in year tGIitit

Leverageit
Agei
γt

ϵit

The analysis employs three estimation

     
      


effects as randomly distributed variables which also
exhibit no association with model parameters. The

through hypothesis testing. The researchers employ

solution. The researcher selects FE when the null
  




In where FPit−1 accounts for persistence in

Diagnostic tests
Different diagnostic tests were implemented
to validate the reliability and robustness of the
regression models that handled the relationship

The tests evaluated for existing econometric issues
  
   
and normality violations. This section explains
the individual diagnostic tests alongside their
obtained results and their corresponding effects.


control variables. The VIF value should be below
10 for healthy multicollinearity status.
Table 1. Multicollinearity test
Variable VIF Score
Green Innovation (GI) 1.89
Regulatory Compliance 1.76
Firm Size 2.11
Industry Type 1.65
Source: author own elaboration.
The VIF scores presented in Table 1 are less
       
multicollinearity effect among explanatory
    
reliability and stability in this model framework.
This analysis made use of both Breusch-Pagan test
and the White test. When the null hypothesis fails
to hold it indicates heteroskedasticity because
homoskedasticity/constant variance describes
the situation.
Table 2. Heteroskedasticity test
Test Chi-Square
Statistic p-value Decision
Breusch-
Pagan test 9.35 0.154 Fail to reject H₀
White test 11.20 0.131 Fail to reject H₀
Source: author own elaboration.
The results indicate heteroskedasticity is not

0.05 in Table 2. The research used robust standard

results proved no heteroskedasticity. The Durbin-
Watson statistic was computed. The value of 2
indicates no autocorrelation although the statistic
below 2 points towards positive autocorrelation
and values above 2 signify negative autocorrelation.
15
ARTÍCULOS
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194
Table 3. Autocorrelation test
Model Durbin-Watson Statistic
ROA Regression Model 1.91
ROE Regression Model 1.89
Tobin’s Q Regression Model 1.95
Source: author own elaboration.

approach 2 which confirms there is no substantial
autocorrelation present in residual values. The
results confirm the suitability of applying fixed-
effects regression models along with no need for
additional adjustments due to serial correlation.
The researchers conducted an F-test on the
joint significance of squared predicted values
appended to the regression model through the

Table 4. Ramsey RESET test
Model F-statistic p-value Decision
ROA Regression Model 1.34 0.261 Fail to reject H₀
ROE Regression Model 1.28 0.275 Fail to reject H₀
Tobin’s Q Regression Model 1.42 0.237 Fail to reject H₀
Source: author own elaboration.
The p-values in Table 4 demonstrate that


and eliminate any bias from omitted variables or
incorrect functional forms. The analysis revealed
results from testing skewness and kurtosis of

show normal distribution of residuals when
p-value increases.
Table 5. Jarque-Bera test
Model Jarque-Bera Statistic p-value Decision
ROA Regression Model 5.12 0.077 Fail to reject H₀
ROE Regression Model 5.89 0.052 Marginal rejection
Tobin’s Q Regression Model 6.01 0.049 Reject H₀
Source: author own elaboration.
16
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194



appear small enough for inference to remain


should be employed to verify normality in case acute
non-normality emerges in future research using
standard errors or robust approaches.
Table 6. Summary of Diagnostic tests
Diagnostic test Assumption Checked Result Action Taken
VIF test Multicollinearity No multicollinearity detected None required
Breusch-Pagan/White test Homoskedasticity Homoskedasticity assumed Robust standard errors used
Durbin-Watson test Autocorrelation No signicant autocorrelation None required
Ramsey RESET test Functional form specication Correctly specied None required
Jarque-Bera test Normality of residuals Mild deviation in some models Consider bootstrapping in future
Source: author own elaboration.

regression models used in this investigation follow
the required statistical inference conditions. The
diagnostic tests validate that the used regression
models meet every requirement for valid statistical
inference without serious multicollinearity
problems and heteroskedasticity along with

form of the model remains appropriate. The results
maintain their validity since the robust estimation
approaches tolerate minor deviations from normal
distribution. The results concerning how GI

reliable and robust in nature.
Results and Discussion
The study period (2015–2024) displayed data
statistical patterns through Table 7 for all sample

Table 7. Descriptive statistics
Variable Mean Std. Deviation Min Max
Green Innovation (GI) 3.78 1.42 0.00 6.95
ROA 0.078 0.061 -0.18 0.25
ROE 0.122 0.095 -0.30 0.40
Tobin’s Q 1.25 0.52 0.42 3.10
Regulatory Compliance 0.68 0.21 0.00 1.00
Firm Size (ln Assets) 12.45 1.85 9.20 16.30
Industry Type 1.45 0.50 1.00 2.00
Source: author own elaboration.
17
ARTÍCULOS
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194
The descriptive statistics reveal key insights into
the variables under study. The scale GI measurement
shows a mean value at 3.78 and standard deviation
of 1.42 while keeping a distribution between 0.00

-0.18 to 0.25 with an average of 0.078 and standard

     


distributions from -0.30 to 0.40 in the sample. The

    


maintain standard regulatory compliance based on
the low standard deviation (SD = 0.21) while the

Total asset measurements computed as the natural
log produce an average value of 12.45 while showing
standard deviation at 1.85 and extending from

Industry Type factors to be distributed as binary
or categorized choice between 1.00 and 2.00 with
average score of 1.45 at SD = 0.50.
Correlation matrix
Table 8 displays all key variable Pearson
    
about bivariate relationships and potential
   
       



 
        


 

which points to some correspondence between
the measures of compliance and the performance
outcomes. Firm Size exhibits low correlations with




moderate strength which indicates meaningful

above 0.70 are minimal therefore minimizing
multicollinearity issues in the regression analysis.
Table 8. Correlation matrix
Variables GI ROA ROE Tobin’s Q RC FS
Green Innovation (GI) 1.00
ROA 0.32*** 1.00
ROE 0.28*** 0.61*** 1.00
Tobin’s Q 0.24*** 0.43*** 0.39*** 1.00
Regulatory Compliance 0.19* 0.22** 0.18* 0.15 1.00
Firm Size 0.13 0.10 0.09 0.21** 0.06 1.00
Note: *p<0.10, **p<0.05, ***p<0.01.
Source: author own elaboration.
18
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194
Regression results

In where FPiti
in year tGIitRCit
FSit
= Natural log of total assets (proxy for
ITit

and εit
= Error term.
Table 9. Fixed Eects Regression Results
Variables ROA ROE Tobin’s Q
Green Innovation (GI) 0.014*** 0.021*** 0.110***
Regulatory
Compliance 0.009* 0.012** 0.045*
Firm Size -0.002 -0.001 0.031***
Industry Type -0.005 -0.003 0.024
Constant 0.051*** 0.078*** 0.920***
R-squared (Within) 0.38 0.35 0.41
Note: *p<0.10, **p<0.05, ***p<0.01.
Source: author own elaboration.

analysis which analyzes GI together with other
control variables to determine their impact on


value across all three performance indicators









     
    
Type fails to show any meaningful relationship
with the evaluated performance measures. Within-
individual performance variations are explained




type through equation 5 by creating interaction
terms for the model.
Table 10. Moderating eects
Interaction Term ROA ROE Tobin’s Q
GI × Firm Size 0.003** 0.004* 0.016***
Source: author own elaboration.
Table 10 presents a positive and statistically

      

strengthens the link between GI and performance
outcomes. The combination of GI and Firm
Size demonstrates a positive relationship with




valuation when compared to smaller counterparts.
This supports Hypothesis H3.
Robustness checks
   
utilizes multiple different functional forms to re-
19
ARTÍCULOS
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194




employs the log of sales growth as a new metric to

practice through research to establish ways in




  
independent of measurement methods as well as


various impacts of GI by categorizing organizations
into two high-polluting and low-polluting
organizations. Cement and chemical industries give
rise to strong environmental pollutants whereas
those industries that generate less pollution are
food processing and textiles. Findings have shown
that the performance-enhancing effect of GI is
more effective in companies which also cause more
pollution compared to the ones that produce less
pollution. Firms that work in environmentally

advantages through their adoption of GI strategies
because they face stronger regulatory forces
alongside intense stakeholder oversight and they

Table 11. Sub-sample Analysis
Group ROA Coecient ROE Coecient Tobin’s Q Coecient
High-Polluting 0.017*** 0.025*** 0.130***
Low-Polluting 0.010* 0.015** 0.090***
Source: author own elaboration.
The Table 11 statistical analysis shows GI as









market performance among companies operating in

because these sectors experience more regulatory
pressure and saving potential along with enhanced

performance analysis shows that high-polluting

them facing heavier regulatory requirements and
operational problems that green technologies
address professionally.
This research produces sound evidence that
supports the fact that GI has a good outcome on
    

that they are capable of establishing a competitive

unique resources and precious assets such as green
technologies and sustainability. Companies that
make investments in environment-friendly research
and development as well as cleaner production
strategies generate twofold fortunes of reducing
the cost of operation and increasing the operational


The results justify the concept of the Stakeholder
Theory as consumers as well as investors and
regulators are among the stakeholders who compels
  


   
raise the trust of its investors that leads to the high

an extra promotion based on the study of the size
20
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194

adherence to environmental laws and standards



sustainable strategies than small businesses.

past research studies conducted in the developed
      


regulations lead to novelty growth and the creation
of price cut along with market choice known by
researchers as Porter Hypothesis. The GI engines
of Pakistani companies are primarily due to the
demand of the trade and global requirements that


agenda and customer requirements.
Policy implications
The data gathered in the research shows that
     
opt with GI due to it being a strategic business
method. To succeed in local and international
 
environmental research and development and
deploy effective technologies and attain green

   
businesses are able to measure their development
as well as convey value to their stakeholders.
The implementation of GI is highly determined
by the policies that are developed by the


environmental policy. The government should
thus work on increasing its efforts to enforce
the existing environmental regulations and offer
economic stimulus packages including tax credits

friendly technology. The reporting standards
of environmental sustainability fosters the
implementation of sustainable practices by various
industries at the small and big business levels.
Through encouraging the collaboration between the

acquire knowledge and skills regarding the adoption
of green technology options.
The ESG factors have emerged as critical
criterion that investment evaluation process of the
investor should consider. This paper suggests that
companies that specialize in GI both have better

regarding linkage between ESG integration and
portfolio growth. Having a GI measure incorporated
in the institutional valuation models and risk
measures are useful in enabling mutual funds and
institutions to see those companies that are doing
well but with high-order thinking ability.
There are certain limits of this study in the

listed is the primary source used in this research

the results of research to non-listed or privately-

businesses remained omitted from analysis because
they did not disclose their sustainability data or

subjective interpretations. Feedback from research
      
measure green initiatives because other initiatives


are unknown variables that impact both GI output

the panel regression method. New studies need to
conduct qualitative research or distribute surveys
for enhancing the existing quantitative insights

Conclusions



are supported by multiple regression models that

size and regulatory compliance and industry type
data points among others.
    
performance improvement were predominantly

in eco-friendly research and development and the
implementation of clean technology as well as

21
ARTÍCULOS
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194
Companies that actively cut power consumption
and minimized the amount of waste and increased
supply chain sustainability were likely to create
cost cuts and enhance operational effectiveness and





scale of the programs adjusted the effectiveness of
the programs. Uniqueness of green technologies and
other capabilities that bring long-term competitive
advantages are unique capabilities in case of the
     

other capabilities that bring long-term competitive
advantages are unique capabilities in case of the

Companies should have GI as a fundamental
strategy planning tool rather than use it as an

environmental research and development funds and
implement power-saving manufacturing systems

of their sustainable practices companies need to
establish. ESG measuring systems to track their
environmental advancements and share clear
sustainability information with stockholders and

    
benchmark processes to facilitate a collective
understanding of sustainability practices within
their industries.
To encourage GI the government must
implement supportive measures which combine

and development programs. The enforcement of
the environmental standards in the legal framework
is a strong incentive that the businesses implement
the use of environmentally friendly technology.
ESG measurements are to be divulged in publicly
traded companies by a mandatory regulation
since this increases openness and responsibility
of the organization and improves monitoring of
sustainability objectives.


mutually mitigate business impediments as well as
extend to accessible sustainable projects.
GI research must develop new processes of
examining variables that go beyond the simple
      

affect the green decision-making is explained by a
combination of qualitative information received on
case studies and interviews and survey processes
of the managers. The effects of international
sustainability movement on Pakistani multinational





are multiple ways of furthering this information in

of the research beyond 2024 gives an opportunity to
researchers to examine the impacts of recent trends

renewable energy and global supply chain changes
and their impacts on the relationships between


be able to show tenacity of the observed correlation.

    


decision-making processes involved in adopting

thematic analysis is one of the ways of revealing

be systematically observed and measured with the

of future research is to incorporate in the sample


industrial base of Pakistan but are not adequately
represented in current databases. Industry surveys
by details gathered via questionnaires or building

to the researchers but also allows a more in-depth
and more extensive overview of how GI was being


related differences such as the gap between the
industry with high rate of pollution and the one
with low rate of pollution describes the requirement

sustainable development.
22
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES
SHAH MEHMOOD WAGAN
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, Vol. 12, No. 1, enero-junio de 2025, 6-22
E-ISSN 2389-8194
References
      
    
photovoltaic plant with storage in an Italian textile
company. Innovation and Green Development 4

        

stage matter? Applied Economics 57 

       
     
    
the energy industry. Business Strategy and the
Environment 34
       
      
When Do We Talk of Greenwashing? Corporate
Social Responsibility and Environmental
Management32
        
    
    
   Journal of Enterprising
Communities: People and Places in the Global
Economy19

      
performance and corporate value in the coal
industry. Multidisciplinary Science Journal 7
e2025255.
        
of sustainable supply chain integration on green
    Sustainable
Production and Consumption 30
       
       
and environmental performance through green
innovation. International Journal of Procurement
Management 14
        

of supply chains. Operations Management Research
15


the mediating role of green innovation. Green
Finance 4
        
    
Transform Green Transformational Leadership
Into Sustainable Performance? Evidence From an
Emerging Economy. Corporate Social Responsibility
and Environmental Management 32 
2541.


Sustainable Development 33
        
      
performance. Climate Policy 25

    
heavily polluting enterprises in China. Finance
Research Letters76

      
    Risk Analysis
45
    
      
      
      
Challenges in Sustainability 13
      
performance through sustainable manufacturing
practices? The roles of green product innovation and
digital transformation. Journal of Manufacturing
Technology Management36
      

  
Experience. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
34